Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra

Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić, Tea

prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra

Download
PDF 117.88 KB

Professional paper - Review paper

Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra

Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina, 28 (2016), 1-2; 14-23. urn:nbn:hr:184:138439

Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić, Tea

PDF 117.88 KB

Cite this document

APA 6th Edition

Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, T. (2016). Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra. Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina, 28. (1-2), 14-23. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439

MLA 8th Edition

Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, Tea. "Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra." Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina, vol. 28, no. 1-2, 2016, pp. 14-23. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439

Chicago 17th Edition

Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, Tea. "Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra." Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina 28, no. 1-2 (2016): 14-23. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439

Harvard

Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, T. (2016) 'Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra', Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina, 28(1-2), pp. 14-23. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439 (Accessed 20 November 2024)

Vancouver

Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić T. Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra. Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina [Internet]. 2016 April 03 [cited 2024 November 20];28(1-2):14-23. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439

IEEE

T. Schnurrer Luke Vrbanić, "Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra", Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 14-23, April 2016. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439. [Accessed: 20 November 2024]

Cite this item: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:138439

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.

Metadata

Title (croatian)	Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji: jučer, danas, sutra
Title (english)	Neurorehabilitation robotics: past, present, future
Author	Tea Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić
Author's institution	University of Rijeka Faculty of Medicine (Department of Orthopedics and Physical Medicine)
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline	BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE Clinical Medical Sciences Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Abstract (croatian)	Robotika u neurorehabilitaciji osoba nakon moždanog udara ima svoje mjesto u rehabilitacijskom protokolu. Iako postoje različiti dizajni i vrste robota, dvije su osnovne grupe: egzoskeletni roboti, te roboti koji aktiviraju distalni, krajnji dio uda (od engl. end-effector robot). Obje vrste robota koriste se za rehabilitaciju hemiparetične ruke, te za rehabilitaciju hoda kod hemiparetične noge i oštećenja ravnoteže. Glavni cilj je robotom usmjerena vježba dostizanja zadataka sa stalnim povećanjem intenziteta i broja ponavljanja. Bolesnici koji provode terapiju robotom u kombinaciji s fizioterapijom imaju bolji motorički i funkcijski ishod nego bolesnici koji provode samo fizioterapiju. Nadalje, bolesnici u subakutnoj fazi imaju veću korist od bolesnika u kroničnoj fazi neurološkog oštećenja, kao što i bolesnici koji imaju težu hemiparezu imaju bolje krajnje rezultate terapije robotom nego bolesnici koji imaju blažu hemiparezu. Usporedbom egzoskeletnog i end-efektornog robota nisu se pronašle razlike u krajnjoj učinkovitosti.
Abstract (english)	Robotics in brain stroke neurorehabilitation is used as a constituent part of rehabilitation protocols. The diverse robotic devices can be parsed into two broad categories: the „exoskeletal“ and „end-effector“ robotic design. Both robotic devices can be used in hemiparetic hand rehabilitation, as well as in hemiparetic gait rehabilitation and balance impairment. The main rehabilitation goal is task-oriented accompanied by the intensify-matched exercise. Patients who conduct robotics therapy, in combination with physiotherapy, have a significant increase in motoric and functional outcome as compared to the patients who undergo conventional physiotherapy alone. Furthermore, the patients in subacute phase have greater benefit from robotics than chronic brain stroke patients. In addition, patients who are non-ambulatory at intervention onset may benefit more, but ambulatory patients may not benefit from this type of training. The role of the type of device (exoskeletal vs. end-effector) is still not clear.
Keywords (croatian)
Keywords (english)
Language	croatian
Language	english
Publication type	Professional paper - Review paper
Publication status	Published
Peer review	Peer review
Publication version	Published version
Journal title	Fizikalna i rehabilitacijska medicina
Numbering	vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 14-23
p-ISSN	1846-1867
e-ISSN	1848-171X
URN:NBN	urn:nbn:hr:184:138439
Publication	2016-04-03
Document URL	http://hrcak.srce.hr/163321
Type of resource	Text
Access conditions	Open access
Terms of use
Created on	2017-05-15 14:48:01