prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?
  Preuzmi
PDF 1.22 MB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?
Life, 13 (2023), 4; 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13041020
Čehobašić, Adlan; Paladino, Josip; Kaučić, Hrvoje; Mišir-Krpan, Ana; Leipold, Vanda; Mlinarić, Mihaela; Kosmina, Domagoj; Mack, Andreas; Schwarz, Dragan; Divošević, Sunčana; Alerić, Ivana

Citirajte ovaj rad

Čehobašić, A., Paladino, J., Kaučić, H., Mišir Krpan, A., Leipold, V., Mlinarić, M. ... Alerić, I. (2023). Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?. Life, 13. (4). doi: 10.3390/life13041020

Čehobašić, Adlan, et al. "Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?." Life, vol. 13, br. 4, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13041020

Čehobašić, Adlan, Josip Paladino, Hrvoje Kaučić, Ana Mišir Krpan, Vanda Leipold, Mihaela Mlinarić, Domagoj Kosmina, et al. "Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?." Life 13, br. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/life13041020

Čehobašić, A., et al. (2023) 'Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?', Life, 13(4). doi: 10.3390/life13041020

Čehobašić A, Paladino J, Kaučić H, Mišir Krpan A, Leipold V, Mlinarić M, i sur.. Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?. Life [Internet]. 15.04.2023. [pristupljeno 27.04.2024.];13(4). doi: 10.3390/life13041020

A. Čehobašić, et al., "Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?", Life, vol. 13, br. 4, Travanj 2023. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:877059. [Citirano: 27.04.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:877059
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?
AutorAdlan Čehobašić
AutorJosip Paladino
AutorHrvoje Kaučić
AutorAna Mišir-Krpan
AutorVanda Leipold
AutorMihaela Mlinarić
AutorDomagoj Kosmina
AutorAndreas Mack
AutorDragan Schwarz
AutorSunčana Divošević
AutorIvana Alerić
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Rijeci
Medicinski fakultet
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Radiologija
Sažetak (engleski)
Delivering focused radiation doses via linear accelerators is a crucial component of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. The Varian Edge linear accelerator provides highly conformal radiation therapy through a high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD120 MLC) and conical collimator (CC). HD120 MLC adapts to the shape of the target volume using movable tungsten leaves, while CC has a block of conical shape (cones). CC in SRS treatments of small brain metastases is preferred due to its mechanical stability and steeper dose fall-off, potentially sparing organs at risk (OARs) and the brain better than HD120 MLC. This study aims to determine if CC offers significant advantages over HD120 MLC for SRS treatments. For 116 metastatic lesions, CC and HD120 MLC treatment plans were created in Varian Eclipse TPS and compared based on various dose parameters, robustness tests, and QA measurements. The results indicate that CC provides no significant advantages over HD120 MLC, except for slight, clinically insignificant benefits in brain sparing and dose fall-off for the smallest lesions. HD120 MLC outperforms CC in almost every aspect, making it a better choice for irradiating brain metastases with 0.1 cm3 or higher volumes.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaLife
Brojčani podacivol. 13, br. 4, 1020
e-ISSN2075-1729
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/life13041020
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:877059
Datum objave publikacije2023-04-15
URL dokumentahttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/4/1020
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Imenovanje 4.0 međunarodna (CC BY 4.0)
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2023-04-18 07:36:39