prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia
Rad nije dostupan
Znanstveni rad - Prethodno/kratko priopćenje
Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122 (2010), 19-20; 584-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9
Protić, Alen; Horvat, Mladen; Komen-Usljebrka, Helga; Frkovic, Vedran; Žuvic-Butorac, Marta; Bukal, Krešimir; Šustić, Alan

Citirajte ovaj rad

Protić, A., Horvat, M., Komen Usljebrka, H., Frkovic, V., Žuvic Butorac, M., Bukal, K. i Šustić, A. (2010). Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122. (19-20), 584-587. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

Protić, Alen, et al. "Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia." Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 122, br. 19-20, 2010, str. 584-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

Protić, Alen, Mladen Horvat, Helga Komen Usljebrka, Vedran Frkovic, Marta Žuvic Butorac, Krešimir Bukal i Alan Šustić. "Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia." Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 122, br. 19-20 (2010): 584-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

Protić, A., et al. (2010) 'Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia', Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122(19-20), str. 584-587. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

Protić A, Horvat M, Komen Usljebrka H, Frkovic V, Žuvic Butorac M, Bukal K, i sur.. Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift [Internet]. 10.2010. [pristupljeno 27.12.2024.];122(19-20):584-587. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9

A. Protić, et al., "Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia", Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 122, br. 19-20, str. 584-587, Listopad 2010. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:876751. [Citirano: 27.12.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:876751
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia
AutorAlen Protić
AutorMladen Horvat
AutorHelga Komen-Usljebrka
AutorVedran Frkovic
AutorMarta Žuvic-Butorac
AutorKrešimir Bukal
AutorAlan Šustić
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Rijeci
Medicinski fakultet
(Katedra za anesteziologiju, reanimatologiju, hitnu i intenzivnu medicinu)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Anesteziologija i reanimatologija
Sažetak (engleski)
Background: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has gained popularity for ankle and foot surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate the sufficiency of anesthesia for ankle surgery as well as duration of analgesia in postoperative period, using minimal invasive ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, and to compare it with anesthesia and postoperative analgesia following spinal anesthesia. Methods: This prospective study included 40 adult trauma patients with bimalleolar fracture who were scheduled for surgery. They were randomly assigned and divided in two groups. Patients from the first group underwent an Ultrasound-guided femoro-popliteal block (US-FPB), while a spinal anesthesia (SA) was performed for the second group. The local anesthetic 0.5% bupivacaine was used in both groups. Results: Eighteen patients from the first and nineteen patients from the second group completed the study. Levels of anesthesia were sufficient in both groups without significant differences. Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in US-FPB group in comparison to SA group (12 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 1 h) (p < 0.001). At the same time, onset of complete sensory motor block was significantly faster in SA group in comparison to US-FPB group (5 ± 1 vs. 8 ± 3 min) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Minimal invasive US-FPB provides sufficient anesthesia for ankle fracture. In comparison to the SA group, patients from the US-FPB group achieved significantly longer postoperative analgesia, while faster onset of anesthesia was noted in SA group.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Prethodno/kratko priopćenje
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaWiener klinische Wochenschrift
Brojčani podacivol. 122, br. 19-20, str. 584-587
p-ISSN0043-5325
e-ISSN1613-7671
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:876751
Datum objave publikacije2010-10
URL dokumentahttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaZatvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2023-11-02 11:51:14