prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo
  Download
PDF 407.15 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo
Acta Informatica Medica, 26 (2018), 2; 125-129. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129
Demirović, Kenan; Šlaj, Martina; Špalj, Stjepan; Šlaj, Mladen; Kobaslija, Sedin

Cite this document

Demirović, K., Šlaj, M., Špalj, S., Šlaj, M. & Kobaslija, S. (2018). Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo. Acta Informatica Medica, 26. (2), 125-129. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129

Demirović, Kenan, et al. "Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo." Acta Informatica Medica, vol. 26, no. 2, 2018, pp. 125-129. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129

Demirović, Kenan, Martina Šlaj, Stjepan Špalj, Mladen Šlaj and Sedin Kobaslija. "Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo." Acta Informatica Medica 26, no. 2 (2018): 125-129. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129

Demirović, K., et al. (2018) 'Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo', Acta Informatica Medica, 26(2), pp. 125-129. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129

Demirović K, Šlaj M, Špalj S, Šlaj M, Kobaslija S. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo. Acta Informatica Medica [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 December 24];26(2):125-129. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129

K. Demirović, M. Šlaj, S. Špalj, M. Šlaj and S. Kobaslija, "Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo", Acta Informatica Medica, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 125-129, 2018. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:786333. [Accessed: 24 December 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo
Title (english)Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Using Direct and Indirect Bonding Methods in Vitro and in Vivo
AuthorKenan Demirović
AuthorMartina Šlaj
MBZ: 251962
AuthorStjepan Špalj
AuthorMladen Šlaj
MBZ: 89885
AuthorSedin Kobaslija
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Orthodontics)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Dental Medicine
Orthodontics
Abstract (english)
AIM: Aim of article was to compare the shear bond strength of indirectly and directly bonded orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experimental in vitro study included 60 maxillary and mandibular premolars. Teeth were mounted on cold-cure acrylic blocks for each tooth separately and divided into two groups: directly bonded brackets (30 teeth) and indirectly bonded brackets (30 teeth). Brackets (Discovery, Roth 0.022", Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) were bonded using Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) in direct method, while in indirect technique, a combination of Transbond XT and Sondhi Rapid Set (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was used. The shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated. The in vivo study included 30 subjects - 15 with indirectly bonded brackets and 15 with directly bonded brackets. Survival rate was assessed during the period of 6 months. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength was found in direct (7.48±1.61 MPa) and indirect labial bonding methods (7.8.2±1.61 MPa). Both methods produced very similar amount of adhesive remnant on tooth surface (median = 1 ; interquartile range 1-2). There were no significant differences in bracket survival rate between methods. CONCLUSION: Regarding the shear bond strength, adhesive remnant on tooth surface, and survival rate, both indirect and direct methods of orthodontic bracket bonding seem to be equally valuable methods in clinical practice.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleActa Informatica Medica
Numberingvol. 26, no. 2, pp. 125-129
p-ISSN0353-8109
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.125-129
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:786333
Publication2018
Document URLhttp://bib.irb.hr/999126
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) icon
Created on2022-02-14 09:25:20