prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences
  Download
PDF 1013.17 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences
Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 5 (2022), 2; 19-24. https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2022.2.03
Rinčić, Iva

Cite this document

Rinčić, I. (2022). Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 5. (2), 19-24. doi: 10.35478/jime.2022.2.03

Rinčić, Iva. "Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences." Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, vol. 5, no. 2, 2022, pp. 19-24. https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2022.2.03

Rinčić, Iva. "Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences." Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics 5, no. 2 (2022): 19-24. https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2022.2.03

Rinčić, I. (2022) 'Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences', Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 5(2), pp. 19-24. doi: 10.35478/jime.2022.2.03

Rinčić I. Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics [Internet]. 2022 June 30 [cited 2024 December 21];5(2):19-24. doi: 10.35478/jime.2022.2.03

I. Rinčić, "Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences", Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19-24, June 2022. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:028777. [Accessed: 21 December 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Different Views and Interpretations of the Notion of Bioethics and Their Consequences
AuthorIva Rinčić
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Social Sciences and Medical Humanities)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		INTERDISCIPLINARY AREAS OF KNOWLEDGE
Integrative Bioethics (Natural, Technical, Biomedical and Healthcare, Social and Humanistic Sciences)
Abstract (english)
In general, one of the major reasons of misunderstanding the term of bioethics is terminological discrepancy. In the case of bioethics, the two „fathers“ of the word –Fritz Jahr (1926) and Van Rensselaer Potter (1970, most probably without knowing of Jahr) –coined it departing from essentially different premises. By Bio-Ethik, Jahr intended the fusion of the bios (life) and ethos (custom; moral attitude), while Potter tried to combine „biological sciences“ with humanities (primarily ethics). A third interpretative approach appeared in 1971 at the Georgetown Kennedy Institute of Ethics, reducing bioethics to medical ethics and research ethics.No wonder that, at the beginning of the 21st century, all over the world, so many different understandings of bioethics are present. This, to quote Tristram Engelhardt, might guarantee „a fertile or strategic ambiguity,“ but it also has caused profound disagreements among scholars, institutions, and publishers.This paper intends to explore those differences, enter into their reasons and roots, and present an overview of the most important „problems and consequences“ they have created.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleJournal of Intercultural Management and Ethics
Numberingvol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19-24
e-ISSN2601-5749
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2022.2.03
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:028777
Publication2022-06-30
Document URLhttps://jime.csesm.org/index.php/JIME/article/view/230/182
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-01-30 10:11:36