prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach
  Download
PDF 237.45 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach
Acta clinica Croatica, 60. (2021), 1.; 89-95. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13
Vučković, Mirela; Ružić, Lana; Tudor, Anton; Šutić, Ivana

Cite this document

Vučković, M., Ružić, L., Tudor, A. & Šutić, I. (2021). Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach. Acta clinica Croatica, 60.. (1.), 89-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13

Vučković, Mirela, et al. "Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach." Acta clinica Croatica, vol. 60., no. 1., 2021, pp. 89-95. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13

Vučković, Mirela, Lana Ružić, Anton Tudor and Ivana Šutić. "Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach." Acta clinica Croatica 60., no. 1. (2021): 89-95. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13

Vučković, M., et al. (2021) 'Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach', Acta clinica Croatica, 60.(1.), pp. 89-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13

Vučković M, Ružić L, Tudor A, Šutić I. Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach. Acta clinica Croatica [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 November 13];60.(1.):89-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13

M. Vučković, L. Ružić, A. Tudor and I. Šutić, "Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach", Acta clinica Croatica, vol. 60., no. 1., pp. 89-95, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:184:021584. [Accessed: 13 November 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Difference in Patient Quality of Life after Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimally Invasive Approach or Classic Approach
Title (croatian)Razlika u kvaliteti života nakon artroplastike zgloba kuka minimalno invanzivnim pristupom ili klasičnim pristupom
AuthorMirela Vučković
AuthorLana Ružić
AuthorAnton Tudor
MBZ: 216533
AuthorIvana Šutić
Author's institutionUniversity of Rijeka
Faculty of Medicine
(Department of Orthopedics and Physical Medicine)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Orthopedics
Abstract (english)
The increasing rate of orthopedic procedures, hip arthroplasty in particular, requires improvement of surgical techniques, as well as of the respective rehabilitation protocols. The aim of the study was to assess differences in the quality of life and incidence of limping eight years after total hip arthroplasty performed with a minimally invasive or classic approach. This cross-sectional study included 68 patients, i.e. 32 operated with classic approach and 36 with minimally invasive approach during 2011. The following parameters were observed: anthropometric measurements, history of comorbidity, subjective assessment of limping, and SF-36 questionnaire (Short Form Survey Instrument). SF-36 testing, which consists of 8 domains, showed that 5 domains of the quality of life were statistically significantly better in the minimally invasive group (level of significance p<0.05). These domains were role of limitation due to physical health (p=0.01), energy (p=0.02), social functioning (p=0.02), pain (p=0.02) and general health (p=0.00). The minimally invasive group had a statistically significantly lower incidence of limping (p=0.032). Quality of life after hip replacement could be a decisive factor when choosing the type of orthopedic procedure. The higher number of limping patients in the classic approach group may have contributed to differences in the quality of life. In conclusion, the minimally invasive approach enables higher long-term quality of life and functional recovery.
Abstract (croatian)
Sve veća učestalost ortopedskih zahvata, osobito artroplastike kuka, zahtijeva unaprjeđenje kirurških i rehabilitacijskih protokola. Cilj istraživanja bio je ispitati razlike u kvaliteti života i incidenciji šepanja osam godina nakon artroplastike zgloba kuka u bolesnika operiranih minimalno invazivnim ili klasičnim pristupom. Provedeno je presječno istraživanje na 68 bolesnika, tj. 32 operirana klasičnim pristupom i 36 minimalno invazivnim pristupom ugradnje umjetnog zgloba kuka tijekom 2011. godine. Proučavali smo antropometrijske mjere, anamnestičke podatke o komorbiditetima, subjektivne procjene šepanja i popunjavanje standardnog upitnika za procjenu kvalitete života, SF-36 (Short Form Survey Instrument). Analizirajući odgovore na SF-36 upitnik koji sadrži 8 domena, kvaliteta života je u pet domena bila statistički značajno bolja kod bolesnika operiranih minimalno invazivnim pristupom: ograničenje zbog tjelesnih poteškoća (p=0,01), razina energije (p=0,02), socijalno funkcioniranje (p=0,02), bol (p=0,02) i percepcija općeg zdravlja (p=0,00). U skupini s minimalno invazivnim pristupom šepanje je bilo statistički značajno manje prisutno (p=0,032). Kvaliteta života nakon operativnog zahvata trebala bi biti glavni kriterij u izboru operacijskog pristupa. Veći broj bolesnika koji šepaju u skupini operiranoj klasičnim pristupom u odnosu na minimalno invazivni pristup možda također doprinosi razlici u kvaliteti života. U zaključku, minimalno invazivni pristup omogućava dugoročno održavanje više razine kvalitete života i bolji oporavak.
Keywords (english)
Keywords (croatian)
Languageenglish
Languagecroatian
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleActa clinica Croatica
Numberingvol. 60., no. 1., pp. 89-95
p-ISSN0353-9466
e-ISSN1333-9451
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.13
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:184:021584
Publication2021
Document URLhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/259895
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) icon
Created on2021-08-31 10:16:05